This document continues the investigation of special categories (If / Then constants), and compares crystals with organisms.

Crystals and Organisms, Shape, Symmetry and Promorph.

Sequel to the investigation of some (intrinsic) **shapes** of two-dimensional crystals regarding their relationship to intrinsic **point symmetry** and **promorph.**

Bilateral Pentagon

We will now investigate two-dimensional crystals with an intrinsic shape according to a

Figure above **:** Microscopic view of a two-dimensional bilaterally pentagonal D_{1} crystal consisting of the periodic stacking of rectangular building blocks, provided with D_{1} motifs (black). These D_{1} motifs represent the translation-free residue of the crystal (all the same whether it belongs to the plane group Pm, Pg or Cm), and in this example the residue has two antimers. As drawn, the crystal belongs to the plane group Pm (primitive rectangular lattice, pattern of symmetry elements **:** mirror lines only, all of them of the same type). So the crystal of this example itself has two antimers and is thus non-eupromorphic (because the crystal's intrinsic shape suggests five antimers, while in fact there are only two present). Because the building blocks are in fact very small (i.e. in crystals they have microscopic dimensions), all the crystal faces are macroscopically smooth.

The intrinsic shape of our crystal is that of a bilateral pentagon. The grammatical adjective of the latter would be "bilaterally pentagonal" as in "bilaterally pentagonal crystal" (where "bilaterally" is an adverb). But because such a crystal itself is pentagonal as well as bilateral, we can legitimately use the expression "

By removing the lattice connection lines (indicating the building blocks) and the motifs, we obtain a

Figure above **:** Macroscopic view of the bilateral pentagonal crystal of the previous Figure.

The pattern of

Figure above **:** Pattern of symmetry elements of the above given bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal. Its consists of one mirror line (red) only.

Figure above **:** Three crystallographic Forms (red, dark blue, green) are needed to construct the faces of our bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal **:** An initially given oblique face (red, not parallel, neither perpendicular to the mirror line) implies one more face in virtue of the mirror line, resulting in one open Form consisting of two faces (red). In the same way a second initially given face (dark blue) also gives rise to a Form (a second Form) consisting of two faces. Then a third initially given face (green) will not imply yet another face, so we then have a third Form consisting of one face only. These three Forms combine to give our bilateral pentagonal crystal.

Figure above **:** A bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal. The case of __ t w o__ congruent (symmetric) antimers (green, yellow). Note the correspondence between the morphology of the (microscopic) motif (as translation-free residue) and the arrangement of the (macroscopic) antimers of the crystal. In this way the promorph, and in particular the number of antimers is based on the morphology of the translation-free residue of the crystal. This residue is explicitly given in the form of a D

Removing the lattice connection lines and the motifs, results in a

Figure above **:** Macroscopic view of the bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal of the previous figure, with two congruent (symmetric) antimers (green, yellow).

The

Figure above **:** The promorph of the bilateral pentagonal D_{1} crystal with two antimers. It is an isosceles triangle (half a rhombus) and as such the two-dimensional analogue of the isosceles pyramid (half a rhombic pyramid), which represents the promorph of corresponding three-dimensional crystals or other objects. Note the difference in shape between this promorph (bilateral trigon) and that of the crystal (bilateral pentagon) of which it is the promorph. Radial (R) and interradial (IR) directions are indicated.

Figure above **:** A bilateral pentagonal two-dimensional D_{1} crystal. Its D_{1} motifs (black) have five symmetrically arranged antimers. Microscopic view.

Figure above **:** The bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal of the previous Figure. The case of __ f i v e__ similar antimers (green, yellow, blue). Note the correspondence between the morphology of the (microscopic) motif (as translation-free residue of the crystal) and the arrangement of the (macroscopic) antimers of the crystal. In this way the promorph, and in particular the number of antimers, is based on the morphology of the translation-free residue of the crystal. This residue is explicitly given in the form of a D

Removing the lattice connection lines and the motifs, results in a

Figure above **:** Macroscopic view of the bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal of the previous Figure, with five symmetrically arranged antimers (green, yellow, blue).

The next two Figures present another possible configuration of the five (macroscopically conceived) antimers

Figure above **:** Bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal. Another possible case of __ f i v e__ similar antimers (green, yellow, blue).

Removing the lattice connection lines and the motifs, results in a

Figure above **:** Macroscopic view of the bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal of the previous Figure, with five symmetrically arranged antimers (green, yellow, blue).

The

Figure above **:** The promorph of the bilateral pentagonal D_{1} crystal with five similar antimers (previous Figures). It is half a ten-fold amphitect polygon and as such the two-dimensional analogue of half a ten-fold amphitect pyramid which is the promorph of corresponding three-dimensional crystals or other objects.

Figure above **:** A bilateral pentagonal two-dimensional D_{1} crystal. Its D_{1} motifs (black) have three symmetrically arranged antimers. Microscopic view.

Figure above **:** The bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal of the previous Figure. The case of __ t h r e e__ similar antimers (green, yellow, blue). Note the correspondence between the morphology of the (microscopic) motif (as translation-free residue of the crystal) and the arrangement of the (macroscopic) antimers of the crystal. In this way the promorph, and in particular the number of antimers, is based on the morphology of the translation-free residue of the crystal. This residue is explicitly given in the form of a D

Removing the lattice connection lines and the motifs, results in a

Figure above **:** Macroscopic view of the bilateral pentagonal D_{1} two-dimensional crystal of the previous Figure, with three symmetrically arranged antimers (green, yellow, blue).

The

Figure above **:** The promorph of the bilateral pentagonal D_{1} crystal with three similar antimers (previous Figures). It is half a six-fold amphitect polygon and as such the two-dimensional analogue of half a six-fold amphitect pyramid which is the promorph of corresponding three-dimensional crystals or other objects.

In the

**e-mail :**

To continue click HERE