```

```
The Tetragonal Crystal System (Part One)
```

```
```

```

## Introduction

For a general introduction into Crystal Systems and Crystal Classes, see the Essay on The Morphology of Crystals, which the reader should first consult, if he or she is not familiar with Crystal Symmetry and its description.
The reader should also consult the previous Essay on The Isometric Crystal System in order to fully understand the issues in the present Essay.

The Tetragonal Crystal System differs from the Isometric System in the fact that one of its three axes of its axial system stands out, and can be interpreted as the main axis. This means that crystals (grown in a homogeneous environment) either are flattened or elongated.
Conventionally one places this main axis vertical. The two other axes, secondary axes, are perpendicular to the main axis, and are equal in length, and perpendicular to each other. The main axis is either shorter or longer than the secondary axes (even when, in some crystals, it happened to have the same actual length, it still is not equivalent to either secondary axis.
Also in this System we recognize a unit face and a basic Form, from which we can derive all other Forms. Here, like in all the remaining Crystal Systems, we encounter, besides closed Forms, also open Forms, i.e. Forms that do not completely enclose a volume of space. Open Forms cannot exist as real crystals, they can only occur in combinations that do enclose space.
Recall that each Form is generated from a face, by the requirement that the generated Form should have the complete symmetry content of the relevant Crystal Class. Forms of the same Crystal Class can combine, increasing the number of faces. Recall also that for faces only their orientation with respect to the above described system of crystallographic axes counts. So their description only contains their orientatation (inclination). Parallel faces, in the sense that the second face originates by a (parallel) shift of the first face, are crystallographically equivalent.
Also here we'll start with the highest symmetrical Class of the System, the Holohedric Division, derive its Forms and describe some combinations. Then we'll derive the lower symmetric Classes by means of merohedric operations, i.e. applying the concepts of hemihedric, tetartohedric, etc., and again by means of subjecting each basic face (compatible with the Crystal System under consideration) to the symmetry operations of the relevant Class.

```
```

## The Ditetragonal-bipyramidal Class (= Holohedric Division)   4/m 2/m 2/m

In the next Figure we depict the tetragonal system of crystallographic axes plus a derived protopyramid (see below).

Figure 1. Tetragonal system of crystallographic axes, and a derived Protopyramid as a possible Form of the Class. One face of this Form is emphasized by a grey shade.

The symmetry content (bundle) of the Ditetragonal-bipyramidal Crystal Class is :

• Five mirror planes, namely one main mirror plane, lying in the plane of the secondary axes, and four secondary mirror planes (Figure 2.)which are perpendicular to the main mirror plane and intersect in the vertical crystallographical axis, while having angles of 450 between each other. Two of these mirror planes are equivalent and go through the horizontal crystallographic axes (i.e. each one of them contains the vertical axis and one of the horizontal axes), the two other equivalent mirror planes go right between the former.

• Five rotation axes, namely one 4-fold main rotation axis, coincident with the crystallographic main axis, and perpendicular to the main mirror plane, and two + two 2-fold rotation axes, two of them coincident with the horizontal crystallographical axes, the two others lying in between them.

• Center of symmetry.

Figure 2. The equatorial plane of the tetragonal protopyramid, and the traces of the 2 + 2 vertical mirror planes. One set of them (blue) contains, besides the vertical, the horizontal crystallographic axes, the other set makes an angle of 450 with the first set, and only contains the vertical crystallographic axis.

The Holohedric Division of the Tetragonal Crystal System has seven primary Forms :

• Protopyramid.
• Deuteropyramid.
• Ditetragonal pyramid.
• Protoprism.
• Deuteroprism.
• Ditetragonal prism.
• Basic Pinacoid.
(The pyramids are in fact bipyramids) We shall discuss them all.

There are seven basic types of faces, and when we subject each face to the symmetry of our present Crystal Class (which means that we demand that the Forms generated from the faces have the symmetry of the Class) we generate the above Forms. The faces are :

•  (2)   a : a : c
•  (3)   a : ~a : c
•  (1)   a : na : mc
•  (5)   a : a : ~c
•  (6)   a : ~a : ~c
•  (4)   a : na : ~c
•  (7)   ~a : ~a : c
The numbers (1), (2), etc. correspond to the numbered positions of these faces in the stereographic projection of Figure 2a.
Besides the Forms of this Class, also the Forms of all the other Classes of the Tetragonal Crystal System can be derived, by subjecting these faces to the symmetries of the relevant Class. This I will later call the facial approach for deriving the Forms. The Forms of the lower symmetry Classes can also be derived by means of the concepts of Holohedric, Hemihedric, etc., which I will call the merohedric approach. Of course for the derivation of Holohedric Forms we must resume to the facial approach. We can make use of the stereographic projection of faces (face poles) and symmetry elements (like rotation axes and mirror planes). See for an introduction of this projection method HERE in the (general) Essay on the Morphology of Crystals.
Figure 2a depicts a stereogram (i.e. a stereographic projection) of the symmetry elements of the Holohedric Class, and the seven basic faces compatible with the Tetragonal Crystal System (indicated by the numbers corresponding with those of the above listing of these faces) :

Figure 2a. Stereographic projection of the symmetry elements of the Ditetragonal-bipyramidal Crystal Class (= Holohedric Division), and of the seven basic faces compatible with the Tetragonal Crystal System. The indicated faces are multiplied by the symmetry elements and accordingly show up in the stereograms. But in the present figure only one representation of each face is shown.

In the stereogram of Figure 2a. we see a (vertical) 4-fold rotation axis, represented by a black square. This axis, as represented in the Figure, is perpendicular to the screen (or paper). Perpendicular to this axis is the equatorial mirror plane, represented by a solid circle in the plane of the screen (paper). It coincides with the circumference of the projection plane. Further we see (the traces of) two sets of vertical mirror planes. One set of which contains, besides the main axis, the secondary crystallographic axes, i.e. one member of this set contains one secondary axis, the other member contains the other. The second set of vertical mirror planes bisects the angles obtaining between the planes of the first set. All these vertical mirror planes are represented by straight solid lines. Finally we see two sets of 2-fold rotation axes. One set coinciding with the secondary crystallogaphic axes, the other set bisects the angles between the members of the first set. They are represented by small solid ellipses. So all the symmetry elements of the Class are represented in the stereogram.
The seven basic faces, compatible with the Tetragonal Crystal System are also represented in the Figure. As has been said, the numbers correspond to those of the above list of basic faces :

•     1 is the most general face, a : na : mc.   It is inclined in two directions, expressed by the fact that in the stereographic projection it lies within the projection plane. It can become a face of a ditetragonal pyramid. It is represented by a dot. I have also indicated its reflectional counterpart (in virtue of the horizontal mirror plane), namely as a little circle. Its projection coincides with its reflectional counterpart [ For the other faces -- represented as points -- (2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) I have not indicated their possible counterparts (in the vertical direction), and, moreover, the vertical faces, which appear as points on the circumference of the projection plane do not have reflectional counterparts in the vertical direction anyway].

•     2 is the face a : a : c.   It is the unit face of the Tetragonal Crystal System. It can become a face of a protopyramid.

•     3 is the face a : ~a : c.   It can become a face of a deuteropyramid.

•     4 is the face a : na : ~c.   It can become a face of a ditetragonal prism.

•     5 is the face a : a : ~c.   It can become a face of a protoprism.

•     6 is the face a : ~a : ~c.   It can become a face of a deuteroprism.

•     7 (in the center of the Figure)is the face ~a : ~a : c.   It can become a face of a basic pinacoid.
Now it is easy to derive the Forms of the present Crystal Class ( = the Holohedric Division of the Tetragonal System) :

The primary protopyramid, primary bipyramid of type I, is derived from the upper right front face (the unit face of the Tetragonal Crystal System) -- a : a : c, number 2 of Figure 2a -- of the image in Figure 3 (below) -- considered as just being present on its own, without other faces, and which is in fact a certain conspicuous face on some tetragonal crystal chosen to serve as a unit face. The primary protopyramid is derived from this face by demanding that the generated Form possesses the complete symmetry bundle of the present Class :   The face is multiplied by the 4-fold rotation axis resulting in a total of four faces. Then this quadruplet will be doubled by the horizontal mirror plane resulting in the protopyramid.

Figure 3. The primary Tetragonal Protopyramid ( = Tetragonal Bipyramid of type I).

Each face of this Form cuts off a finite piece of each crystallographic axis, and, considering it as the basic Form we can denote it by the Weiss symbol (a : a : c), in which the two a's express the equivalence of the two horizontal crystallographic axes, and the one c expresses the fact that the vertical crystallographic axis is not equivalent to either horizontal one.
The protopyramid is a bipyramid bounded by eight isosceles triangles. Its equatorial plane has the shape of a square. The Naumann symbol is P, and the Miller symbol is {111} (the derivation coefficients of the Weiss symbol and the indices of the Miller symbol are set equal to 1, because all other Forms are considered to be derivations of this one Form).

The stereographic projection of the (faces, i.e. all the faces, of the) tetragonal protopyramid is depicted in Figure 3a.

Figure 3a. Stereogram of the Tetragonal Protopyramid. An upper face (pole) is represented by a red dot. A lower face (pole) is represented by a small circle. In the present case their positions on the projection plane coincide. So we see four sets of two faces each, an upper and a lower one.

The first derived Forms are bipyramids like the protopyramid but with a different a : c ratio when compared with the primary protopyramid of Figure 3. The general Weiss symbol for such pyramids is consequently (a : a : mc), the Naumann symbol is mP (the letter before P relates to the cut-off piece of the vertical crystallographic axis), the Miller symbol is {hhl}.
In figure 1 we already saw such a derived protopyramid (assuming m having there some rational value), and in the figure below we see two examples of derived protopyramids with m = 2 and m = 1/2 respectively (If we would set up a stereogram of such a derived protopyramid we would get the same picture as Figure 3a, but with the projections of the faces closer to the perifery of the projection plane or closer to the center of it respectively.

Figure 4. Derived Tetragonal Protopyramids, with m = 2 (left) and m = 1/2 (right).

In the next Figure we see two more Forms, namely (1) the deuteropyramid and the ditetragonal pyramid.

Figure 5.   1.   primary Deuteropyramid ( = Tetragonal Bipyramid of type II) , 2.   Ditetragonal bipyramid.

While a protopyramid is generated by subjecting the face a : a : mc to all the symmetry operations of the present Crystal Class (when m = 1 we get the primary protopyramid), a deuteropyramid is generated by subjecting the face a : ~a : mc to all those symmetry operations (when m = 1 -- 3 in Figure 2a -- we get the primary deuteropyramid). The shape of the deuteropyramid (tetragonal bipyramid of type II) does not differ from that of the protopyramid. It differs in its orientation with respect to the crystallographic axes. Each of its faces cuts off pieces only from the main axis and from one of the secondary (i.e. horizontal) axes, and is parallel to the other secondary axis.
So the Weiss symbol is (a : ~a : c), or generally, because also derived pyramids are possible, (a : ~a : mc), and the Naumann symbol is mP~ (the sign before P relates to the main axis, the sign after P to the secondary axis)(Recall that the sign ~ stands for infinity, in Figures denoted by a horizontal 8). The Miller symbol is {h0l}.

The stereographic projection of the deuteropyramid is depicted in Figure 5a.

Figure 5a. Stereogram of the Tetragonal Deuteropyramid.

When we subject the face a : na : mc, i.e. a face of which the orientation with respect to the crystallographic axes is the most general, to all the symmetries of the present Crystal Class, we obtain a ditetragonal bipyramid, as yet another Form of the Holohedric Division. The ditetragonal bipyramid has 16 faces, which are oriented such that each of them intersects all three axes at different distances. The equatorial plane is a ditetragon, i.e. an octagon ( = figure with eight sides) having all sides of equal length but with alternating equal angles (See Figure 6.)

Figure 6. A Ditetragon, the equatorial plane of the Ditetragonal bipyramid.

The general Weiss symbol is (a : na : mc) (1 in Figure 2a), the Naumann symbol is mPn, and the Miller symbol is {hkl}. Limiting Forms are the protopyramid, when n = 1, and the deuteropyramid, when n = ~.

The stereographic projection of the ditetragonal bipyramid is depicted in Figure 5b.

Figure 5b. Stereogram of the Ditetragonal Bipyramid.

When for the described pyramids the derivation coefficient m increases the pyramids become more and more sharp. When the coefficient finally is equal to infinity the sides of the pyramids have become vertical (i.e. parallel to the main crystallographic axis) and the Forms become prisms. These are open Forms which, in their conventional oriention do not enclose space completely. Their top and bottom are open.
From the (primary) protopyramid we derive the protoprism ( = tetragonal prism of type I), by letting the unit face, the one which is situated in front, up, and to the right, become steeper and steeper until it is vertically oriented, implying that the cut-off piece (intercept) of the vertical axis is infinite (in length), while the cut-offs of the other two axes remain the same. This new face can be denoted by a : a : ~c (5 of Figure 2a). When we subject this face to all the symmetries of our Crystal Class we will obtain a protoprism as a new Form.
Its Weiss symbol is (a : a : ~c), the Naumann symbol is ~P., and the Miller symbol is {110}.

Figure 7. A Protoprism, derived from a (face of the) Protopyramid. An open Form.

Because the protoprism (and also all other prisms) is an OPEN Form, the next Figure does not correctly depict it, by reason of its suggesting the presence of top and bottom faces (while the protoprism lacks these faces). In fact the Figure depicts a combination of protoprism and basic pinacoid (A basic pinacoid is an open Form, consisting of two horizontal parallel faces. See below).

Figure 8. A combination of a Protoprism and a Basic Pinacoid, forming the top and bottom faces of the (combined) Form.

The stereographic projection of the protoprism is depicted in Figure 7a.

Figure 7a. Stereogram of the Tetragonal Protoprism.
The projection of each face is indicated in the figure as if they represented the coincidence of an upper and lower face pole. But in fact each prism face leads to only one face pole. I depict them nevertheless as is done in the figure in order that the symbols for the 2-fold rotation axes are not obscured by the (projections of the) poles.

A next Form is the deuteroprism ( = tetragonal prism of type II). It derives from the deuteropyramid in the same way that the protoprism was derived from (a face of) the protopyramid, and is distinguished from the protoprism only by its orientation with respect to the crystallographic axes. So the deuteroprism is generated from the face a : ~a : ~c (6 of Figure 2a).

Figure 9. Deuteroprism, an open Form of the Holohedric Division.

The following Figure gives this same deuteroprism, but now closed by a basic pinacoid :

Figure 10. A Deuteroprism, closed by a basic (i.e. horizontal) Pinacoid.

The Weiss symbol for the deuteroprism is (a : ~a : ~c), the Naumann symbol is ~P~., and the Miller symbol is {100}.

The stereographic projection of the deuteroprism is depicted in Figure 9a.

Figure 9a. Stereographic projection of the Tetragonal Deuteroprism.
See the remark at Figure 7a concerning the representation of the projection of the face poles.

The next Form is the ditetragonal prism. It can be derived from the ditetragonal bipyramid (See Figure 5 (2), by isolating a face and letting it become vertical. We then have the face a : na : ~c (4 of Figure 2a). When we subject this face to all the symmetries of our Crystall Class we'll get the ditetragonal prism :   The isolated face will be doubled by the nearby mirror plane resulting in two symmetrically related faces having an angle between each other smaller than 1800. This pair of faces will then be multiplied four times by the action of the 4-fold rotation axis, resulting in the ditetragonal prism, consisting of eight vertical faces. Its horizontal outline (i.e. when seen from above, or below) is the same as that of the equatorial plane of the corresponding ditetragonal bipyamid (See also Figure 6).
The Weiss symbol is (a : na : ~c), its Naumann symbol is ~Pn., and the Miller symbol is {hk0}.
See Figure 11. Here we depict the ditetragonal prism as if it is closed by a basic pinacoid (top and bottom faces) for reasons of clarity.

Figure 11. The Ditetragonal Prism.

The stereographic projection of the ditetragonal prism is depicted in Figure 11a.

Figure 11a. Stereogram of the Ditetragonal Prism.

Finally we have the basic pinacoid. We already spoke about it earlier. Like the prisms it is an open Form. It consists of two horizontal parallel faces (because the faces are horizontal it is called a basic pinacoid. In other Crystal Classes there also exist pinacoids which are not oriented horizontally). A pinacoid can also be called parallelohedron. See figure 12.

Figure 12. A Basic Pinacoid (Basic Parallelohedron), another open Form of the Holohedric Division.

The basic pinacoid will be generated when we take a horizontally oriented face -- such a face can be denoted by ~a : ~a : c (7 of Figure 2a) -- and subject it to the symmetry of the present Class. The 4-fold rotation axis and the vertical mirror planes will have no effect, but the horizontal mirror plane will duplicate the face (the 2-fold rotation axes will have the same effect), so we'll end up with a Form consisting of two parallel horizontal faces, the basic pinacoid, which is, as has been said, an open Form and can only occur in certain combinations, for example with a prism.
The Weiss symbol is (~a : ~a : c), the Naumann symbol is 0P., and the Miller symbol is {001}.
The "0" in the Naumann symbol 0P means that the face is inclined by an amount of zero, i.e. it is horizontal. We can think of it as the upper right front face of the protopyramid, with its steepness decreased all the way down to zero, i.e. its coefficient for c has become zero. But of course the coefficient can have whatever value, including 1, because varying its hight above or below the origin of the system of crystallographic axes does not change the crystallographic character of the face (a parallel shift of a face does not change its crystallographic character, but notice that parallel faces are not necessarily crystallographically equivalent. The two faces of a pinacoid are equivalent, they involve the same atomic aspect to the environment, and so implying the same physical behavior. In fact all the faces constituting a Form are equivalent in this respect. As we will see further below there exist (in other Classes than the present one) Forms consisting of just one face. Such a Form is called a pedion. And it is possible that, together with other Forms, two pedions combine, forming a pair of parallel faces. But these faces are not equivalent because they belong to different forms, a pedion and another pedion).

The stereographic projection of the basic pinacoid is depicted in Figure 12a.

Figure 12a. Stereogram of the Basic Pinacoid.

```
```
All these Forms can engage in combinations with each other. In the Figures 13 and 14 we show some examples.

Figure 13. 1.   Protoprism + Protopyramid.   2.   Deuteroprism + Protopyramid.

```
```

Figure 14. 1.   Protopyramid + derived Protopyramid.   2.   Protopyramid + Basic Pinacoid (The polar corners of the pyramid are cut off by the Basic Pinacoid).

```
```
As real representatives of the Ditetragonal-bipyramidal Class we could mention :
The minerals Cassiterite SnO2, Zircon ZrSiO4, Rutile TiO2   (STRÜBEL, 1977, p. 91).
To see the (larger) picture(s) click on the corresponding small picture(s). To return, click the BACK button of your browser.

Rutile - the Alps, twin, about 10mm.

```
```
THE FORMS OF THE LOWER SYMMETRICAL CLASSES.
The Forms of the lower symmetrical Classes can be derived by means of two equivalent methods :
1. Merohedric approach.
In this approach (method) we start with the holohedric Forms and suppress certain (types of) mirror planes (depending on which merohedric we apply). Because of this suppression certain faces of the holohedric Form can dissappear except when they are perpendicular to one of the suppressed mirror planes. The remaining (conserved) faces are then allowed to extend themselves till they meet (in cases where they can meet at all). The merohedric Form is now generated. Some of these Forms appear to be open Forms, others closed Forms. And sometimes we obtain a new Form, sometimes we get a Form that was already present in the Holohedric Class.

2. Facial approach.
In this approach (method) we subject the typical faces (i.e. the face orientations typical for, and compatible with, the system of crystallographic axes of the relevant Crystal System) one by one to the symmetries of the relevant Crystal Class of the particular Crystal System, resulting each time in a Form. To subject a face to the symmetries of the relevant Crystal Class means that we demand that the generated Form must have all the symmetries of the Class.
We'll obtain precisely the same Forms as by the first method. To visualize what precisely happens when we subject a face to the symmetry operations of the Crystal Class, and to predict what Form will be generated, is facilitated by using the STEREOGRAPHIC PROJECTION of typical faces and of the symmetry elements of the Class. See the Section on the Stereographic Projection in the Essay on the (general) Morphology of Crystals.
For each Form to be derived we first apply the Merohedric Method, because it is relatively easy to visualize what is going on in this method of derivation.
Secondly we will use the Facial Method, to again derive those same Forms, in order to understand even better what Forms in fact are.

```
```

## The Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class (= Hemimorphy of Holohedric )   4 m m

Because the Tetragonal Crystal System recognizes a main axis (that is) to be distinguished from the other crystallographic axes, a special type of hemihedric, namely hemimorphy is possible in all cases where there initially is a mirror plane perpendicular to this main axis. To suppress this mirror plane is to apply a hemimorphy. Each bipyramid and each basic pinacoid decays into an upper and lower half which are independent of each other. Consequently we can find, for example, a combination in which the upper faces are the faces of a hemimorphous pyramid, which is closed at the bottom by a hemimorphous (basic) pinacoid, which is called a pedion.
The symmetry content of this Class is :
• Four (2 + 2) vertical mirror planes.

• One 4-fold polar rotation axis.

### Derivation of the Forms of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class

MEROHEDRIC APPROACH.
The Forms of this Class can be derived from the holohedric Forms by suppressing the equatorial mirror plane (main mirror plane).

Let us start with the first holohedric Form, the protopyramid. From the next Figure it is evident that we can derive two four-sided (mono)pyramids, one from the colored faces and one from the white faces :

Figure 15. Applying hemimorphy to the Protopyramid yields two type I monopyramids.

In Figure 16 and 17 we depict the two resulting monopyramids.

Figure 16. The Tetragonal Pyramid of type I, derived from the colored faces of the protopyramid (= bipyramid of type I) of Figure 15.

In the Naumann symbol I have added a h in order to distinguish this hemihedric (namely hemimorphy) from other hemihedrics.

Figure 17. Tetragonal pyramid of type I, derived from the white faces of the protopyramid ( = bipyramid of type I) of Figure 15.

When these two Forms combine, the bipyramid is restored, but crystallographically the horizontal mirror plane is still absent, which will be evident by physical differences.

In fact the figures 16 and 17 each depict a combination of (1) a monopyramid and (2) a face which is called a pedion (this is a single face, that results after subjecting a pinacoid to hemimorphy. See below). The pedion closes the pyramid. But although this pedion is in fact drawn in each Figure, we interpret these Figures, and also all other like figures, as single open Forms, unless otherwise stated. I draw these closing faces (instead of the broken-off faces of, say, Figure 7) for reasons of clarity with respect to interpreting the image.

When we apply hemimorphy to the deuteropyramid ( = bipyramid of type II) (Figure 5, 1) we again obtain two type II monopyramids, one of which is depicted in Figure 18.

Figure 18. Tetragonal Pyramid of II type, derived from the Deuteropyramid ( = bipyramid of type II)).

The From the ditetragonal bipyramid (Figure 5, 2) we can derive two hemimorphous ditetragonal monopyramids, one of which is depicted in Figure 19.

Figure 19. A Ditetragonal Monopyramid, derived from a holohedric Ditetragonal Bipyramid by applying a hemimorphy.

As can be seen in Figure 20, the protoprism ( = tetragonal prism of type I) will not change its outer shape when it is subjected to hemimorphy. So the resulting Form is (still) a tetragonal prism of type I, but it has nonetheless lost its horizontal plane of symmetry.

Figure 20. A Protoprism does not change its outer shape when subjected to hemimorphy, but despite its outer appearance it does not possess a main mirror plane anymore which can become evident by physical features.

Precisely the same is the case for the other prisms :

The deuteroprism ( = tetragonal prism of type II) yields again a tetragonal prism of type II (but of lower symmetry).

The ditetragonal prism yields again a ditetragonal prism, but of lower symmetry.

When hemimorphy is applied to the Basic Pinacoid (Figure 12) we obtain a pedion ( = monohedron). It is a single face, thus, like the pinacoid and the prisms, an open Form. It can close a prism (two pedions are needed for full closure) or monopyramid by combining with them (recall that only Forms belonging to the same Crystal Class can combine with each other, and recall also that open Forms cannot exist all by themselves but only in combinations resulting in closed structures). Of course two pedions will be generated by applying hemimorphy to a basic pinacoid, an upper pedion and a lower pedion. They are however each for themselves single, i.e. each one of them is an independent Form, and they can engage in a combinations, including combinations among themselves. So when for instance a hemimorphous prism is closed by two pedions (i.e. by a combination of a top pedion and a bottom pedion), these pedions do have the same crystallographic orientation (only their position is different), but because of the absence of a horizontal mirror plane the corresponding top and bottom faces will show some physical differences. For the two pedions see Figure 21. and 22.

Figure 21. A Pedion or Monohedron, derived by hemimorphy from a Basic Pinacoid.

```
```

Figure 22. A second Pedion, also derived from a Basic Pinacoid by hemimorphy.

This concludes the derivation of the Forms of the Diteragonal-pyramidal Crystal Class by the Merohedric approach.

FACIAL APPROACH.
The Forms of this Class can also be derived from the basic faces (face types, relevant and compatible with the Tetragonal Crystal System).
These Faces are :

•     a : a : c
•     a : ~a : c
•     a : na : mc
•     a : a : ~c
•     a : ~a : ~c
•     a : na : ~c
•     ~a : ~a : c
We will subject these faces one by one to the symmetries of the Class.

The stereographic projection of the symmetry elements of this Class will help us visualize the subjection of those faces to these symmetry elements :

Figure 23. Stereogram of the symmetry elements of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class, and the (stereographic projection of the) face poles of the Form derived from the face with a general orientation, namely the face a : na : mc. The (dashed) circle is the projection plane, and the dashing indicates that this plane is not a mirror plane. Solid straight lines are vertical mirror planes.

The position of all the basic faces together   in the projection plane of the stereographic projection is indicated in Figure 2a, and separately below. The symmetry elements of the present Class (as depicted in Figure 23) will multiply some faces, and leave unchanged others, depending on their orientation.

The face a : a : c (indicated in Figure 24) will, when subjected to the symmetry elements of the present Class, yield the type I tetragonal monopyramid of Figure 16, consisting of four faces, in virtue of the (effect of the) 4-fold rotation axis

Figure 24. The position of the face (pole) a : a : c (red dot)   in the stereographic projection of the (elements of the) Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class. The multiplication of the general face a : na : mc (black dots) is also indicated in order to clearly show the effect of the symmetry operations.

The stereographic projection of the type I tetragonal monopyramid is depicted in Figure 24aI, which shows the multiplication of the face a : a : c by the symmetry operations of the present Class (Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class).

Figure 24aI. Stereogram of the Type I Tetragonal Monopyramid.

From the face a : a : -c (which is just a negative variant of a : a : c) we can derive the other
' half ', i.e. also a tetragonal pyramid, but with its apex directed downward. This Form is depicted in Figure 17. It is the lower half of the holohedric protopyramid. Its stereographic projection is depicted in Figure 24aII.

Figure 24aII. Stereogram of the other Type I Tetragonal Monopyramid. The face poles are depicted by (small red) circles to indicate that the faces are below the equatorial plane of the Form, i.e. below the plane of the secondary crystallographical axes.

The face a : ~a : c (indicated in Figure 25) will, when subjected to the symmetry elements of the present Class, yield a type II tetragonal monopyramid, i.e. a same pyramid as the one derived from a : a : c, but differing in its orientation (Figure 18). The face a : ~a : -c will give the same pyramid, but with its top down.

Figure 25. The position of the face (pole) a : ~a : c (red dot)   in the stereographic projection (of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class).
To clearly show the workings of the symmetry operations of the Class, their effect upon the general face
a : na : mc is shown (black dots).

The stereographic projection of the type II tetragonal monopyramid is depicted in Figure 25a.

Figure 25a. Stereogram of the Type II Tetragonal Monopyramid ( = upper half of the holohedric Deuteropyramid, which is itself a bipyramid).

The face a : na : mc (indicated in Figure 27) will yield a ditetragonal monopyramid (Figure 19, for n = 2). The face is not parallel to any crystallographic axis. The mirror plane next to the face (see Figure 27) will generate a second face making an angle with the original face (See also 26). This pair of faces is then multiplied four times by the 4-fold rotation axis, resulting in the monopyramid mentioned.

Figure 26. Equatorial plane of the tetragonal system of crystallographic axes. Depicted are the two secondary crystallographic axes, which coincide with vertical mirror planes. The face a : na : mc is reflected in the mirror plane m, and this reflection results in an additional face a : -na : mc, i.e. we now have two faces making an angle with each other.

```
```

Figure 27. Position of the face (pole) a : na : mc (red dot) in the stereogram of the (elements of the) Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class. This face will be reflected and the resulting pair will be multiplied four times by the 4-fold rotation axis.

The stereographic projection of the ditetragonal monopyramid was already depicted in Figure 23, but is again shown in Figure 27a.

Figure 27a. Stereogram of the Ditetragonal Monopyramid.

The face a : a : ~c (indicated in Figure 28) is vertical. The 4-fold rotation axis will generate four such faces, and so a type I tetragonal prism (Figure 7) is generated. Although this prism has the same external shape as the one depicted in Figure 7, it does not have a (crystallographic) equatorial mirror plane, and its Naumann symbol is consequently not but , where "2h" indicates the hemimorphy involved.

Figure 28. Position of the face (pole) a : a : ~c in the stereogram of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class.

The stereographic projection the Type I tetragonal prism is depicted in Figure 28a.

Figure 28a. Stereogram of the Type I Tetragonal (hemimorphous) Prism.

The face a : ~a : ~c (indicated in Figure 29) is vertically oriented and parallel to the east-west crystallographic axis. It will be multiplied four times by the 4-fold rotation axis resulting in a type II tetragonal prism (Figure 9), but again it lacks a horizontal mirror plane. Its Naumann symbol is therefore .

Figure 29. Position of the face (pole) a : ~a : ~c in the stereogram of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class.

The stereographic projection of the type II tetragonal prism is depicted in Figure 29a.

Figure 29a. Stereogram of the Type II (hemimorphous) Tetragonal Prism.

The face a : na : ~c (indicated in Figure 30) is vertical, it intersects both secondary axes, but the intercepts are different. Like the case of face a : na : mc the nearby vertical mirror plane generates two faces making an angle with each other, and this pair is being multiplied four times by the 4-fold rotation axis resulting in a ditetragonal prism, consisting of eight faces (Figure 11), but again it lacks an equatorial mirror plane. Its Naumann symbol is therefore .

Figure 30. Position of face (pole) a : na : ~c in the stereographic projection of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class.

The stereographic projection of the ditetragonal prism is depicted in Figure 30a.

Figure 30a. The stereogram of a Ditetragonal (hemimorphous) Prism.

But of course a slightly different ditetragonal prism is possible (because the coefficient n of the face a : na : ~c can vary while still resulting in a ditetragonal prism). The stereographic projection of such a slightly different ditetragonal prism is shown in Figure 30aI.

Figure 30aI. Stereogram of a slightly different Ditetragonal (hemimorphous) Prism.
The position of the generating face in the stereogram can vary along the arc between two mirror planes, resulting in several possible ditetragonal prisms.

Finally, the face ~a : ~a : c (indicated Figure 31) is horizontally oriented. It is not affected by any symmetry element of the present Class, so it remains a horizontal face, a pedion (Figure 21).

Figure 31. Position of the face (pole) ~a : ~a : c (red dot) in the stereogram of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Class. It will not be affected by the symmetry operations of this Class (See Figure 31a).
The black dots still represent a general face
a : na : mc, and show the workings of the symmetry elements.

The stereographic projection of the pedion (monohedron) is depicted in Figure 31a.

Figure 31a. Stereogram of the Pedion, one the Forms of the Ditetagonal-pyramidal Crystal Class.

```
```
This concludes our derivation of the Forms of the Ditetragonal-pyramidal Crystal Class (accomplished by two approaches).

As a real representative of this Class I can mention :
The pseudocubic mineral Diaboleite 2Pb(OH)2 . CuCl2   (STRÜBEL, 1977, p. 89).

```

```
To continue, klick HERE for Part Two.

back to homepage

****************